Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        Implementing an HSA with HDHP: How Hard Could it Be?

        December 2, 2011

        High-deductible health plans (HDHPs) with a Health Savings Account (HSA) feature are growing in popularity. While implementing an HDHP/HSA arrangement can be complicated, having a sense of the landscape can prevent uncomfortable bumps and bruises. This post explores some of the general eligibility questions we are asked most frequently. It is the first in a series on HDHP/HSA arrangements, and we hope that together these posts will provide a useful overview on implementing an HDHP/HSA arrangement.

        1. Can an employer offer a health flexible spending account (FSA) to employees not enrolled in the HDHP and a dependent care assistance plan (DCAP) to all employees, and are there any problems with this? There are no problems with offering a DCAP to all employees. There are no problems with offering a health FSA or health reimbursement account (HRA) to those employees not participating in the HDHP/HSA. There may, however, be minor issues in the first year of HSA coverage for those employees who previously were covered by a health FSA or HRA, and there are also issues for employees whose spouses are covered under a health FSA or HRA.

        Specifically, an individual who is covered by general-purpose health FSA or HRA is not eligible to make or receive HSA contributions for the entire period of the health FSA or HRA coverage, even if the individual has exhausted his or her health FSA or HRA account balance. If the individual’s health FSA has a grace period, the grace period will not make the individual ineligible for HSA contributions as long as the individual has a $0 balance at the end of the plan year associated with the grace period. (A grace period allows participants to receive reimbursement for claims incurred up to 2½ months after the end of the plan year and is different than a plan’s claims run-out period or timeline for submitting claims after the plan year ends.)

        In addition, an individual will not be eligible for HSA contributions if his or her qualified medical expenses can be paid or reimbursed under his or her spouse’s health FSA or HRA. Importantly, the burden of determining HSA eligibility falls almost entirely on the employee – employers that contribute to an employee’s HSA are only responsible for determining the following: (1) whether the employee is covered under an HDHP or any low-deductible health plan (including health FSAs and HRAs) sponsored by that employer, and (2) the employee’s age (for catch-up contributions).

        There are alternatives for dealing with this health FSA/HRA coverage issue, such as amending the health FSA or HRA to cover only limited expenses (such as dental, vision, and/or preventive care expenses); this is known as a “limited purpose” health FSA or HRA and is considered HSA compatible.

        2. If an employer has a non-calendar year health insurance renewal (or plan year) with a health FSA that runs on a calendar year basis, what happens for those employees who elect a health FSA for the calendar year if they elect the HDHP with the HSA effective on the renewal date? Suppose an employer operates its group health plan on an October 1 to September 30 plan year, corresponding to the health insurance policy year. An employee cannot be covered by a health FSA and receive or make contributions to an HSA. An employee is not eligible to contribute (or receive employer contributions) to an HSA until the health FSA year has ended. For a health FSA without a grace period, an employee switching from health FSA to HSA coverage would not be able to contribute (or receive employer contributions) to the HSA until January 1, even though the plan year begins on October 1, and even if the employee’s FSA balance is $0. The rules are different if the health FSA has a grace period – if the employee had not exhausted his or her health FSA account by December 31, the employee would not be able to contribute (or receive employer contributions) to the HSA until the end of the grace period.

        3. Can employees age 65 or older contribute to an HSA? Employees age 65 or older can contribute to an HSA (and receive an employer contribution) as long as the employee is not receiving Medicare or Social Security benefits. The determination is based solely on receipt of Medicare/Social Security benefits, not the employee’s age.

        4. Suppose an active employee who is contributing to an HSA turns 65, thereby becoming Medicare eligible and experiencing a qualifying event. Must that employee be allowed to enroll in the non-HDHP medical plan options (PPO, HMO, etc.), and/or be provided with the option to continue participation in the HDHP without receiving employee or employer HSA contributions? First, it is actual enrollmentin Medicare Part A or Part B, not eligibility to enroll, that entitles a participant to an election change, and that change can only be to reduce or cancel a health coverage election (the so-called consistency rule). Second, employer and employee HSA contributions are permitted for an employee who is eligible for but not enrolled in Social Security/Medicare. Thus, an active employee participating in an HDHP/HSA will only lose eligibility for HSA contributions if the employee enrolls in Social Security/Medicare benefits. Such an employee would still be eligible to participate in the HDHP or could choose to drop HDHP coverage or elect another option that qualifies as a reduction in coverage.

        5. But isn’t Medicare Part A enrollment automatic? Enrollment in Medicare Part A is automatic for people receiving Social Security benefits; that is why an individual receiving Social Security benefits is not eligible for HSA contributions. On the other hand, an employee who is eligible to receive Social Security benefits but does not actually enroll to receive Social Security benefits remains eligible for HSA contributions.

        6. May employer HSA contributions be limited to active employees? Yes, so long as the company does not make contributions to any class of former employee.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Published Works

        Four Verrill Attorneys Co-Author Massachusetts Trends and Developments Chapter for Chambers and Partners Child Relocation 2026 Guide

        Verrill attorneys Mary H. Schmidt, Rachel A. Deering, Hannah R. Zukoff, and Mariah G. Tappan co-authored the “Trends and Developments” chapter...
        Blog

        A New Protected Class in Maine: Holders of Final Protection Orders

        In the lead-up to Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October, employers may be taking a closer look at how their policies and practices respond to...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...
        Blog

        Hurry Up and Wait

        This is the third in a series of Verrill blog posts on Maine’s packaging extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) law[1]. In July we reported...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses First Brands Chapter 11 Case in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the rejection of First Brands Group's Chapter 11 plan and the...
        Media Mentions

        Cybersecurity and AI Governance: Scott Anderson Featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        Verrill Managing Partner Scott Anderson was recently featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly discussing how law firms can build attorney buy-in for...
        Blog

        Section 530A Account Update: ERISA Status of Trump Accounts

        The Department of Labor has issued important guidance addressing whether employer programs that permit contributions to Section 530A accounts (and...
        Press Releases

        97 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2027, Including Four Named Lawyers of the Year

        AUGUSTA, Maine, BANGOR, Maine, BOSTON, Mass., PORTLAND, Maine, and WESTPORT, Conn., (August 20, 2026) – Verrill is proud to announce that 97...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SEC’s Proposed “Reg Crypto”: What Founders Need to Know

        Startup founders and emerging-growth companies have a number of options for raising capital under the federal securities laws, including Regulation D...
        Blog

        After 45 Years, the IRS Speaks on DCAP Nondiscrimination Testing – And It’s Good News

        Employers that provide a Dependent Care Assistance Program will be pleased to learn that for the first time in 45 years, the IRS has issued guidance...
        Media Mentions

        U.S. Courts Highlights Annabel Rodriguez’s Journey from Fellow to Mentor

        Verrill attorney Annabel Rodriguez was featured in a recent U.S. Courts article titled “From Fellows to Mentors: Alumni Share Lasting Lessons from...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses Bankruptcy Auction Strategy in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach spoke with Law360 article examining the complex bankruptcy auction process that resulted in the sale of 23 summer...