You Might Be a Winner
        A blog from the attorneys of Verrill

        A Post Guaranteed to Give a Lesson on Money Back Guarantees (or Your Money Back)

        by Robert Laplaca on January 15, 2018

        Ever hear of the “Trial Mark”? In 1869, for his home brewed medicinal products J.R. Watkins created bottles that included an embossed “Trial Mark.”

        Mr. Watkins sold his products door-to-door and offered the first Money Back Guarantee to consumers, provided their use of the product did not extend beyond the “Trial Mark.” – Ingenious!

        One hundred and fifty years later, money back guarantees are a trillion (with a T) dollar business in the U.S. With that comes about a 10 billion (with a B) dollar loss for businesses.

        The Pros (from the consumer side):

        • “Yay! I can try this product risk-free!”
        • “This company must really trust its products.”
        • “This company’s better than that company because they don’t offer a money back guarantee.”

        The Cons (from the business side):

        • “I can’t read the receipt and the form isn’t signed, what should I do?’
        • “Can we donate the unused portion to the Goodwill?”
        • “If I have to amend the balance sheets again, I’m gonna blow.”

        Let’s take a look at what guarantees you can get if you end up in court.

        What is the meaning of “Satisfaction Guaranteed”? Courts have actually grappled over the interpretation of this oft-used phrase. The consensus is that it is to be interpreted based upon the understanding of a “reasonable person” – not an unconditional customer-determined satisfaction.

        Is the customer’s recovery limited to the price of the product? Not necessarily. Courts have held that a money back guarantee does not insulate the seller from fraud or defective practices.

        Is an exclusive remedy provision enforceable? Generally, yes; absent fraud or deception.

        Must consumers comply with the terms’ prerequisites to obtain a refund? Courts will uphold clear, unambiguous submission requirements that are substantially complied with for a refund.

        What material terms should be included in a MBG? At a minimum, the material terms of a money back guarantee should include:

        • Specific identification of the product (specially-marked is good).
        • Specific instructions for the refund, including all materials that must be sent in, typically, original MBG form, original store receipt and original UPC, and if practical, the used portion of the product.
        • The dates (i) for purchase, (ii) for redemption and (iii) for expected refund.
        • Geography (U.S. only, etc.)
        • Exclusions such as geographic, family/household members, groups, fraud, illegible, incomplete.
        • Number of purchases/redemptions allowed per person.
        • Contact number/email of sponsor representative.

        This post should in no way be interpreted as a guarantee that money back guarantees are the perfect remedy to keep you in business for 150 years.

        You Might Be a Winner

        Promotion and sweepstakes laws vary widely across the fifty states and under federal regulations, creating complex challenges for today’s innovative marketers. This blog explores the latest updates and trends in promotion and marketing law, offering practical insights to help brands stay compliant while pushing creative boundaries. We’ll also discuss noteworthy, questionable, and groundbreaking promotional campaigns to encourage thoughtful discussion among marketing and legal professionals.

        Key Contacts

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Alerts and Newsletters

        Can AI Pass the Doctor Test? FDA Considers Physician-Inspired Evaluation of GenAI Devices and Other Regulatory Measures

        AI is entering healthcare with indomitable will. It promises to increase efficiency, reduce administrative burden (which healthcare providers so...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Attorney Annabel Rodriguez Named Top Women of Law by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill attorney Annabel Rodriguez has been recognized as a Top Women of Law by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, and will be...
        Blog

        What Employee Benefits Lawyers Do (and How to Make the Best Use of Us)

        What do employee benefits lawyers do all day and how can clients make the best use of them? This post offers an overview of the kinds of things...
        Media Mentions

        Bloomberg Law Quotes Robert Keach on Expanded Access to Small Business Reorganization

        Verrill attorney Bob Keach was recently featured in Bloomberg Law, discussing legislation that would raise debt limits for bankruptcy relief and...
        Blog

        Phil Bartlett to Step Down as Chair of the Maine Public Utilities Commission

        On September 15, 2026, Governor Janet Mills announced that Phil Bartlett will step down as Chair of the Maine Public Utilities Commission (PUC)...
        Published Works

        Jay McCormack and Michael Fee Co-Author AHLA Article on Skin Substitute Enforcement Trends

        Verrill Partners Jay McCormack and Michael Fee co-authored an article for the American Health Law Association's Fraud and Abuse Practice Group...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Health Care & Life Sciences Attorney Elpida Velmahos

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to announce that Elpida Velmahos has joined the firm’s Health Care & Life Sciences Group as an...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Litigation & Trial Attorney Emma Pooler

        PORTLAND, Maine – Verrill is pleased to announce that Emma Pooler has joined the firm’s Litigation & Trial Group as an Associate, resident in...
        Published Works

        Four Verrill Attorneys Co-Author Massachusetts Trends and Developments Chapter for Chambers and Partners Child Relocation 2026 Guide

        Verrill attorneys Mary H. Schmidt, Rachel A. Deering, Hannah R. Zukoff, and Mariah G. Tappan co-authored the “Trends and Developments” chapter...
        Blog

        A New Protected Class in Maine: Holders of Final Protection Orders

        In the lead-up to Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October, employers may be taking a closer look at how their policies and practices respond to...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...
        Blog

        Hurry Up and Wait

        This is the third in a series of Verrill blog posts on Maine’s packaging extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) law[1]. In July we reported...