Taking Care of HR Business
        A blog from the attorneys of Verrill

        Federal Vaccine Mandates – What We Know and What We Don’t

        by Elizabeth T. Johnston on October 4, 2021

        On September 9, President Biden announced plans to require that federal workers, federal contractors, and employees of employers with 100 or more employees are vaccinated or tested weekly for COVID-19. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the Safer Federal Workforce Task Force have been tasked with drafting regulations to effectuate the President’s initiative, and, on September 24, 2021, the Safer Federal Workforce Task Force issued guidance as to the mandate for federal contractors and subcontractors. Based on that guidance, here are key takeaways that employers subject to federal contracts should note:

        • Applicability: All contract and contract-like instruments entered into with the federal government must include a mandated vaccination clause (as well as other requirements). Such clauses must be included in all lower-tier contracts entered into for a project as well. The requirements must apply to “all covered contractor employees, including contractor or subcontractor employees in covered contractor workplaces who are not working on a Federal Government contract or contract-like instrument.”
        • Obligations: Federal contractors and subcontractors must adhere to the following protocols:
          • COVID-19 vaccination of all employees (except in limited circumstances where employee obtains an accommodation as a result of a health condition or sincerely held religious belief);
          • Compliance by individuals (including contractor employees and visitors) concerning masking and physical distancing in the workplace; and
          • Designation of a person to coordinate COVID-19 workplace safety efforts at covered workplaces.

        OSHA has yet to release guidance on requirements for employers with 100 employees or more. While we wait for draft regulations, there are many questions that have yet to be answered regarding the mandate. For example:

        • How will the 100-employee threshold be interpreted? Will it be based on a certain time period or employee tenure? How might seasonal employers be affected?
        • Will employees working remotely be required to be vaccinated or tested weekly?
        • How will employers verify a worker’s vaccination status?
        • Will boosters be required for employees who are already vaccinated?
        • How will religious or disability exemptions permitted?
        • How will the mandate impact employer incentive or penalty programs for employee vaccinations?

        Another important and currently unanswered question is who will bear the burden of paying for weekly testing for employees who decline to get vaccinated? For this question, state law may play a determinative role in the answer. Some states, including Maine, have laws specifically addressing whether an employer or employee must pay or not pay for a medical examination. For example, Maine law prohibits an employer from requiring an employee to bear the expense of a medical examination when that examination is ordered or required by the employer. Because a COVID-19 test likely constitutes a medical examination, Maine employers probably could not pass on the cost of mandated testing to employees without risking compliance with Maine wage and hour laws. Even if your state does not have a law governing payment for medical examinations and the federal mandate permits payment by employees, employers must still be cognizant of other wage and hour laws, such as those governing permissible paycheck deductions, in relation to employee payment for weekly testing.

        We will update our guidance as more information becomes available. In the meantime, please feel free to contact a member of Verrill’s Employment and Labor Group with any questions.

        Taking Care of HR Business

        Human resource professionals, supervisors, and company executives are constantly confronted with a changing legal landscape. Verrill’s Taking Care of HR Business blog is designed to keep you informed about the latest and most significant legal developments that affect employers.

        Key Contact

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...
        Blog

        Will the Knicks Beat the Spurs? (Are Prediction Market Event Contracts Gambling?)

        For those of you who like to keep score, currently 18 states are engaged in litigation over prediction markets, such as Kalshi and Polymarket,...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Faster Review and Enhanced Enforcement for Benefits-Fraud FCA Matters

        On May 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Division issued a new memorandum, “Accelerating Review and Enhancing Enforcement in...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown; Signals Intensified Medicaid Enforcement Nationwide

        On May 21, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a first-of-its kind Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown charging 15 defendants, including...
        Media Mentions

        Lauren Galvin Quoted in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly on Arbitration and Anti-SLAPP Protections

        Verrill Partner Lauren Galvin was recently featured in a Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly article highlighting a notable Superior Court decision...
        Blog

        Section 530A Accounts: What Employers Should Consider Before Offering Contributions to “Trump” Accounts

        Section 530A accounts, commonly referred to as Trump accounts, have attracted attention since the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in...
        Blog

        Navigating PBM Reform: Regulatory Changes, Market Shifts, and Practical Guidance for ERISA Fiduciaries

        Pharmacy Benefit Manager (“PBM”) arrangements have long relied on rebates with limited transparency into true drug costs. Recent regulatory and...
        Blog

        DOL’s Proposed Regulation on Selecting Alternative Investments: Broad Implications for 401(k) and 403(b) Plan Fiduciaries

        On March 30, 2026, the Department of Labor issued a proposed regulation purporting to implement an executive order to expand access to “alternative...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Attorney Gracie Castle

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to welcome Gracie Castle to the firm’s Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Group as an Associate,...
        Published Works

        Francesco De Vito Authors Article in the Journal of the American College of Mortgage Attorneys

        Verrill Partner Frank De Vito authored an article featured in the Spring 2026 issue of The Abstract, the journal of the American College of Mortgage...