Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        Retiree Medical Coverage: Just Get the COBRA Waiver

        by Karen K. Hartford on October 2, 2023

        The interaction between employer-provided retiree medical coverage and COBRA[1] is complex. Many employers incorrectly assume they do not have to offer COBRA at retirement if they offer a retiree medical plan or a retiree health reimbursement arrangement (HRA), but the calculus is not that simple. Whether there is a requirement to offer COBRA, and, if so, to whom and when, depends on several factors, as discussed below. Given the recent rise in COBRA litigation and the potential penalties for COBRA notice violations, we recommend that employers routinely seek informed waivers of COBRA coverage at retirement.

        COBRA Continuation Coverage

        The premise of COBRA is straightforward: if a group health plan covered individual (a “qualified beneficiary”) experiences a qualifying event and that event results in a loss of coverage under the group health plan, COBRA continuation coverage must be offered for the time periods specified in the law.

        COBRA continuation coverage is the same coverage that the individual had on the day before the qualifying event. COBRA enrollees are responsible for 100% of the cost of the coverage (both the employee and the employer portions) plus up to a 2% administrative fee.

        Two COBRA-qualifying events apply to employees and dependents alike:

        • the employee’s termination of employment, and
        • the employee’s reduction in hours of employment.

        If one of these events results in a loss of coverage under the group health plan, the plan must offer the affected qualified beneficiaries 18 months of COBRA continuation coverage.

        In addition, qualified beneficiaries who are covered dependents may experience one of the following qualifying events:

        • the covered employee’s death,
        • the covered employee becoming entitled to Medicare,[2]
        • divorce or legal separation from the covered employee, or
        • a dependent child ceasing to be a dependent under the terms of the plan.

        When one of these events results in a loss of coverage under the group health plan, the plan must offer affected qualified beneficiaries 36 months of COBRA continuation coverage.

        Retirement as a Qualifying Event

        When a covered employee retires, they experience a qualifying event – termination of employment. The question then becomes whether such an event results in a loss of coverage requiring a COBRA offer.

        Retiree Medical Coverage – Identical Coverage Under Same Plan

        If an employer extends coverage for retirees under the same active employee plan that the employee had pre-retirement, and the coverage – including the cost of coverage to the individual – is identical both pre- and post-retirement, there is no loss of coverage and therefore no requirement to offer COBRA.

        CAUTION: In this circumstance, if the extended coverage is subsequently lost prior to the applicable maximum COBRA period (i.e., 18 or 36 months), then the retiree and any covered dependents will experience a COBRA qualifying event at the time of the subsequent loss, requiring an offer of COBRA continuation coverage for the applicable maximum period.

        This outcome can be avoided if the employer requires all retirees and their covered dependents to sign a COBRA waiver at retirement as a condition of participating in the employer’s retiree medical coverage. Note that COBRA waivers do not become effective until the COBRA election period (typically 60 days) has expired, and qualified beneficiaries may make changes to their election until it becomes effective.

        Retiree Medical Coverage – Different Coverage or a Separate Plan

        If an employer offers its retirees coverage under the same plan as the retiree had pre-retirement but on different terms (i.e., different benefit coverage, different cost to the individual) or coverage under a separate plan, the retiree is considered under the law and regulations to have experienced a loss of coverage and must be offered COBRA. A loss of coverage will be deemed to occur even if the retiree is eligible for Medicare and the employer offers a Medicare supplement plan or a contribution to a retiree HRA to be used for Medicare premiums, and even if the employer coverage is more generous than Medicare or the employer fully subsidizes the retiree coverage. Put simply, when an employer offers retirees coverage on different terms or coverage under a separate plan, it cannot avoid its obligation to offer COBRA. The employer can, however, condition participation in its retiree medical coverage upon the waiver of COBRA.

        Retiree Medical Coverage Offered for a Fixed Period: If at the time of retirement an employer offers the retiring employee a choice between COBRA or retiree coverage for a fixed period (e.g., 12 months, 36 months, etc.), and the employee elects the retiree coverage, no additional COBRA right will arise at the end of the fixed period.

        CAUTION: If retiree coverage is offered for a fixed period and a second COBRA qualifying event, such as the death of the retiree, occurs before the end of such fixed period and results in the loss of coverage for covered dependents, such dependents will be entitled to an offer of COBRA at the time of the loss.

        This outcome can be avoided if the employer takes steps to ensure that:

        • its plan documents specify that retiree coverage of dependents will also last for the specified fixed period and will not be lost upon the occurrence of any subsequent COBRA qualifying event that occurs prior to the end of that fixed period; and
        • all qualified beneficiaries are informed at the time of the employee’s retirement that by electing retiree coverage for a fixed period, they have waived future COBRA rights.

        Retiree Medical Coverage Offered for an Indefinite Period: If at the time of retirement an employer offers the retiring employee a choice between COBRA or retiree coverage for a period of time that cannot be quantified at the start (e.g., until the occurrence of a future event such as the retiree’s death or the retiree’s entitlement to Medicare), the employer would be well-advised to collect COBRA waivers from all qualified beneficiaries. Without the waivers, any qualified beneficiary who subsequently loses coverage due to the occurrence of a COBRA qualifying event must be offered COBRA.

        Conclusion

        The interaction between retiree medical coverage and COBRA is complicated; the penalties and excise taxes for COBRA notice violations can be costly; and lawsuits for failure to offer COBRA or to compel coverage can be costly and time-consuming. Small changes in plan language and taking action to seek informed waivers from qualified beneficiaries can make a big difference. Please contact a member of Verrill’s Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group if you have questions regarding retiree medical coverage and COBRA.


        [1] COBRA stands for Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, as amended. It is a federal law that applies to employers with 20 or more employees and provides employees with the right to continue coverage under their employer’s group health plans for a limited time.

        [2] The details regarding the extent to which Medicare entitlement is or is not a COBRA-qualifying event is beyond the scope of this blog post.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Key Contact

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...
        Blog

        Hurry Up and Wait

        This is the third in a series of Verrill blog posts on Maine’s packaging extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) law[1]. In July we reported...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses First Brands Chapter 11 Case in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the rejection of First Brands Group's Chapter 11 plan and the...
        Media Mentions

        Cybersecurity and AI Governance: Scott Anderson Featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        Verrill Managing Partner Scott Anderson was recently featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly discussing how law firms can build attorney buy-in for...
        Blog

        Section 530A Account Update: ERISA Status of Trump Accounts

        The Department of Labor has issued important guidance addressing whether employer programs that permit contributions to Section 530A accounts (and...
        Press Releases

        97 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2027, Including Four Named Lawyers of the Year

        AUGUSTA, Maine, BANGOR, Maine, BOSTON, Mass., PORTLAND, Maine, and WESTPORT, Conn., (August 20, 2026) – Verrill is proud to announce that 97...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SEC’s Proposed “Reg Crypto”: What Founders Need to Know

        Startup founders and emerging-growth companies have a number of options for raising capital under the federal securities laws, including Regulation D...
        Blog

        After 45 Years, the IRS Speaks on DCAP Nondiscrimination Testing – And It’s Good News

        Employers that provide a Dependent Care Assistance Program will be pleased to learn that for the first time in 45 years, the IRS has issued guidance...
        Media Mentions

        U.S. Courts Highlights Annabel Rodriguez’s Journey from Fellow to Mentor

        Verrill attorney Annabel Rodriguez was featured in a recent U.S. Courts article titled “From Fellows to Mentors: Alumni Share Lasting Lessons from...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses Bankruptcy Auction Strategy in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach spoke with Law360 article examining the complex bankruptcy auction process that resulted in the sale of 23 summer...
        Media Mentions

        Martha Gaythwaite Featured in Portland Press Herald Coverage of Sig Sauer Trial Victory

        Verrill attorney Martha Gaythwaite was highlighted in media coverage of a federal trial in Bangor involving firearm manufacturer Sig Sauer. As...
        Media Mentions

        Law360 Quotes Robert Keach on Senate Bill Affecting Small Business Restructurings

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article discussing federal legislation that would permanently restore the $7.5 million...