Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        SECURE 2.0 Incentivizes Plan Sponsors to Promptly Correct Automatic Enrollment and Automatic Escalation Errors

        by Anna Mikhaylina on December 19, 2025

        We often are asked how to correct automatic enrollment and automatic escalation errors in 401(k) and 403(b) retirement plans. The fix typically has required plan sponsors to make qualified nonelective contributions (“QNECs”) for affected participants, in the amount of either 25% or 50% of the missed deferrals, plus earnings. However, a zero-dollar alternative was available for certain promptly corrected failures that began on or before December 31, 2023, and the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 (“SECURE 2.0”) expanded this safe harbor and made it permanent. This post will:

        • Explain the requirements plan sponsors must follow to utilize the safe harbor correction method for automatic enrollment and automatic escalation errors;
        • Offer practical steps plan sponsors can take now to use the safe harbor; and
        • Serve as a reminder to plan sponsors that the ability to self-correct errors depends on having compliance practices and procedures in place for the plan.

        Before SECURE 2.0

        The IRS guidance for retirement plan corrections, Rev. Proc. 2021-30, contained a safe harbor correction method for 401(k) plans and 403(b) plans with automatic enrollment or automatic escalation errors that began on or before December 31, 2023. The safe harbor was not available to correct errors that began after December 31, 2023.

        What Changed Under SECURE 2.0?

        Section 350 of SECURE 2.0 added a new Internal Revenue Code section 414(cc), which codified and expanded the pre-SECURE 2.0 safe harbor correction method to include automatic enrollment or escalation errors that began after December 31, 2023.

        The statute

        Section 414(cc) requires that the error must be a “reasonable administrative error” that is corrected:

        • For all similarly situated participants in a nondiscriminatory manner; and
        • No later than the affected employee’s first paycheck on or after the earlier of:
          • The end of the month following the month in which the affected employee notifies the employer of the error; or
          • The last day of the 9½-month period after the end of the plan year in which the error first occurred.

        Section 414(cc) also requires that notice of the error be given to the affected employees not later than 45 days after the date on which correct deferrals begin, and that the notice satisfies content requirements in IRS guidance and regulations.

        In addition, Section 414(cc) expands the scope of self-correction because it permits the correction to occur:

        • Before or after the participant has terminated employment; and
        • Without regard to whether the IRS identifies the error.
        IRS guidance

        IRS Notice 2024-2 (at Part II, Section I) clarifies that plan sponsors may use the safe harbor correction method outlined in Rev. Proc. 2021-30, Appendix A, section .05(8), including the notice provisions. Section .05(8)(c) sets forth content requirements for the required notice to affected employees and the deadlines for distributing the notice. The notice must:

        • Include the plan name and plan contact information (including name, street address, e-mail address, and phone number of a plan contact);
        • Provide general information relating to the failure (such as the percentage of compensation that should have been deferred and the approximate date deferrals should have started);
        • Inform the individual that corrective allocations relating to missed matching contributions have been made (or will be made);
        • Inform the individual that correct deferrals have begun (or will begin shortly); and
        • Inform the individual that they may increase their deferral percentage to make up missed deferrals (subject to the Internal Revenue Code  402(g) limit and, if applicable, the applicable limit under Internal Revenue Code §414(v)).[1]

        What about matching contributions?

        SECURE 2.0 did not relax the requirement that plan sponsors make a corrective contribution equal to the amount of matching contributions, if any, that would have been made for the participant’s missed elective deferrals, adjusted for earnings. To qualify for no QNECs with respect to the missed elective deferrals, the plan sponsor must make a corrective allocation of matching contributions by the last day of the sixth month following the month in which correct elective deferrals begin.

        Practices and procedures

        While SECURE 2.0 significantly expanded self-correction opportunities for retirement plan sponsors, errors can be self-corrected only if the plan sponsor has established and follows compliance practices and procedures for its plans. The practices and procedures must be reasonably designed to promote and facilitate compliance with the rules governing retirement plans.

        Action Steps for Plan Sponsors

        As we look ahead to 2026, now is a good time for plan sponsors to review their retirement plan practices and procedures and compliance calendars and implement safeguards to operationalize the automatic enrollment and automatic escalation safe harbor correction method. Plan sponsors should:

        •  Adopt processes to review automatic enrollment and automatic escalation data for errors well in advance of the statutory deadline to correct such errors. The general deadline to correct is 9½ months after the end of the plan year in which the error first occurred. While the 9½-month correction window is critical, the internal deadline to review data from the prior year can be flexible and may vary based on the HR team’s needs.
        • Consider establishing an earlier internal deadline to save on earnings for any corrective matching contributions and, in any event, make sure to remit corrective matching contributions, plus earnings, to the plan no later than the last day of the sixth month following the month in which correct elective deferrals begin.
        • Adopt the processes described above even if you have not encountered automatic enrollment and automatic escalation errors in the past.  These types of errors are very common despite evolving technology.
        • Ensure that HR team members are familiar with the steps they need to take when employees report irregularities with automatic enrollment and automatic escalation. When an employee raises a concern, the correction deadline accelerates to the end of the month after the affected employee notifies the employer of the error (but does not extend beyond 9½ months after the end of the plan year in which the error first occurred).
        • Timely provide the required notice described above if you detect automatic enrollment or automatic escalation errors during your review, or a participant notifies you of such errors.
        • Connect with your recordkeeper and payroll software vendor to identify ways to align reporting for automatic enrollment, automatic escalation, and automatic deferrals.
        • Document your processes and maintain records of notices to ensure proof of compliance.
        • Finally, if you have practices and procedures, ensure that the practices and procedures, whether formal or informal, are robust enough to support eligibility for self-correction.

        Please contact a member of Verrill’s Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group if you have any questions regarding the correction of retirement plan operational errors or document failures under EPCRS.


        [1] The last two requirements do not apply to notices for terminated employees.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Key Contacts

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Blog

        Hurry Up and Wait

        This is the third in a series of Verrill blog posts on Maine’s packaging extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) law[1]. In July we reported...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses First Brands Chapter 11 Case in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the rejection of First Brands Group's Chapter 11 plan and the...
        Media Mentions

        Cybersecurity and AI Governance: Scott Anderson Featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        Verrill Managing Partner Scott Anderson was recently featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly discussing how law firms can build attorney buy-in for...
        Blog

        Section 530A Account Update: ERISA Status of Trump Accounts

        The Department of Labor has issued important guidance addressing whether employer programs that permit contributions to Section 530A accounts (and...
        Press Releases

        97 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2027, Including Four Named Lawyers of the Year

        AUGUSTA, Maine, BANGOR, Maine, BOSTON, Mass., PORTLAND, Maine, and WESTPORT, Conn., (August 20, 2026) – Verrill is proud to announce that 97...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SEC’s Proposed “Reg Crypto”: What Founders Need to Know

        Startup founders and emerging-growth companies have a number of options for raising capital under the federal securities laws, including Regulation D...
        Blog

        After 45 Years, the IRS Speaks on DCAP Nondiscrimination Testing – And It’s Good News

        Employers that provide a Dependent Care Assistance Program will be pleased to learn that for the first time in 45 years, the IRS has issued guidance...
        Media Mentions

        U.S. Courts Highlights Annabel Rodriguez’s Journey from Fellow to Mentor

        Verrill attorney Annabel Rodriguez was featured in a recent U.S. Courts article titled “From Fellows to Mentors: Alumni Share Lasting Lessons from...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses Bankruptcy Auction Strategy in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach spoke with Law360 article examining the complex bankruptcy auction process that resulted in the sale of 23 summer...
        Media Mentions

        Martha Gaythwaite Featured in Portland Press Herald Coverage of Sig Sauer Trial Victory

        Verrill attorney Martha Gaythwaite was highlighted in media coverage of a federal trial in Bangor involving firearm manufacturer Sig Sauer. As...
        Media Mentions

        Law360 Quotes Robert Keach on Senate Bill Affecting Small Business Restructurings

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article discussing federal legislation that would permanently restore the $7.5 million...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SAFEs and Preferred Stock – Key Deal Terms Every Founder Should Know

        SAFEs Before negotiating a term sheet for preferred stock, many early-stage companies, particularly at the seed stage, first raise capital through...