You Might Be a Winner
        A blog from the attorneys of Verrill

        There’s No Such Thing as a “Free” Sample: FTC Provides Guidance on Advertising “Free” Samples Combined with Recurring Charges

        by Robert Laplaca on September 23, 2016

        On Tuesday (September 20, 2016), the FTC and Nutraclick entered into a consent order concerning Nutraclick’s online offer for “free” samples of supplements and beauty products. The FTC alleged that Nutraclick failed to clearly disclose to people who requested the samples that they would be enrolled in a membership program and billed up to $79.99 per month, unless they canceled within an 18-day trial period. While this promotional offer may have netted significant profits, its success was short-lived when at least 70,000 filed complaints prompting the FTC investigation.

        The FTC alleged violations of the FTC Act’s prohibition against unfair or deceptive acts or practices (15 U.S.C. §45(a)) and the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act, which pertains to selling online through a negative option feature, i.e., where a consumer’s silence is interpreted as an acceptance of the offer. 15 U.S.C. §8403.

        The Promotion (According to the FTC Complaint):

        1. Nutraclick’s ads and emails encouraged consumers to “CLICK HERE TO GET YOUR FREE SAMPLE”
        2. When you “click here” you go to a landing page with a brightly-colored button stating “FREE SAMPLE”.
        3. When you click this button, you go to a page to type in your personal information.
        4. You are then directed to a page to provide your shipping information and “answer a few questions.” This page states “FREE SAMPLE, PAY ONLY SHIPPING AND HANDLING.”
        5. You are then directed to a page to enter your credit card information, stating “Just pay for shipping and handling.”

        Disclosures:

        1. The website had a small gray bar at the bottom of some pages that contained hyperlinks to “Terms”, “Privacy Policy”, “Copyright Information”, etc. Only the “Terms” hyperlink triggered a pop-up box describing the membership program and recurring monthly fees. The online sign-up did not require consumers to click on this link to get the “free” sample.
        2. The payment page had in the lower left corner a long paragraph in small type that describes the “Terms & Conditions.” Half-way through, the recurring charges and cancellation process is described.
        3. Later, Nutraclick added two disclosures to its payment page: (i) a description of the cancelation method mixed with information regarding shipping and product satisfaction and next to a large seal stating “Money-Back Guarantee” and (ii) a check box below the payment information agreeing to the terms and conditions (without a hyperlink).

        Resolution:

        According to the Consent Order, Nutraclick must disclose “clearly and conspicuously” and in “close proximity” to the billing information, the following:

        1. That a consumer will be charged and incur recurring charges.
        2. The amount and frequency of such charges.
        3. The deadline for a consumer to act to stop incurring charges.
        4. The seller of the products.
        5. A description of the products.
        6. The mechanism for stopping any recurring charges.

        In addition, Nutraclick must send by email or mail written confirmation of the transaction to the consumer within 10 days of the sale which must (i) clearly and conspicuously identify the purpose of the mailing and (ii) contain the above disclosures.

        Specifically, with regard to the negative option feature (i.e., where a consumer is required to take affirmative steps to stop recurring billing), Nutraclick must:

        1. Obtain a consumer’s express consent through a check box, signature or other similar method.
        2. Clearly and conspicuously disclose in close proximity to such check box/signature line:
          1. That the consumer will be charged unless the consumer takes steps to stop;
          2. The amount of such charges;
          3. The deadline for the consumer to act to stop recurring charges.

        Further, the method to stop recurring charges must be a “simple mechanism” which is not “difficult, costly, confusing or time consuming” and “at least as simple as the mechanism the consumer used to initiate the recurring charge.”

        For reference, the term “clearly and conspicuously,” generally, means “difficult to miss (i.e, easily noticeable) and easily understandable by ordinary consumers.” And the term “close proximity” means “immediately adjacent to the triggering representation.”

        The bottom line, as always, make sure when you disclose something as “free” that any qualifiers are clearly disclosed. And if you have a negative option feature be particularly vigilant that the consumers are well-aware of what they are getting into and how they can get out of it. Don’t forget you are dealing with an FTC “Consumer Protection Act” and “Restore Online Shopper’s Confidence Act” – the names alone tell you who gets the benefit of the doubt.

        You Might Be a Winner

        Promotion and sweepstakes laws vary widely across the fifty states and under federal regulations, creating complex challenges for today’s innovative marketers. This blog explores the latest updates and trends in promotion and marketing law, offering practical insights to help brands stay compliant while pushing creative boundaries. We’ll also discuss noteworthy, questionable, and groundbreaking promotional campaigns to encourage thoughtful discussion among marketing and legal professionals.

        Key Contacts

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Blog

        Hurry Up and Wait

        This is the third in a series of Verrill blog posts on Maine’s packaging extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) law[1]. In July we reported...
        Media Mentions

        Cybersecurity and AI Governance: Scott Anderson Featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        Verrill Managing Partner Scott Anderson was recently featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly discussing how law firms can build attorney buy-in for...
        Blog

        Section 530A Account Update: ERISA Status of Trump Accounts

        The Department of Labor has issued important guidance addressing whether employer programs that permit contributions to Section 530A accounts (and...
        Press Releases

        97 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2027, Including Four Named Lawyers of the Year

        AUGUSTA, Maine, BANGOR, Maine, BOSTON, Mass., PORTLAND, Maine, and WESTPORT, Conn., (August 20, 2026) – Verrill is proud to announce that 97...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SEC’s Proposed “Reg Crypto”: What Founders Need to Know

        Startup founders and emerging-growth companies have a number of options for raising capital under the federal securities laws, including Regulation D...
        Blog

        After 45 Years, the IRS Speaks on DCAP Nondiscrimination Testing – And It’s Good News

        Employers that provide a Dependent Care Assistance Program will be pleased to learn that for the first time in 45 years, the IRS has issued guidance...
        Media Mentions

        U.S. Courts Highlights Annabel Rodriguez’s Journey from Fellow to Mentor

        Verrill attorney Annabel Rodriguez was featured in a recent U.S. Courts article titled “From Fellows to Mentors: Alumni Share Lasting Lessons from...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses Bankruptcy Auction Strategy in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach spoke with Law360 article examining the complex bankruptcy auction process that resulted in the sale of 23 summer...
        Media Mentions

        Martha Gaythwaite Featured in Portland Press Herald Coverage of Sig Sauer Trial Victory

        Verrill attorney Martha Gaythwaite was highlighted in media coverage of a federal trial in Bangor involving firearm manufacturer Sig Sauer. As...
        Media Mentions

        Law360 Quotes Robert Keach on Senate Bill Affecting Small Business Restructurings

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article discussing federal legislation that would permanently restore the $7.5 million...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SAFEs and Preferred Stock – Key Deal Terms Every Founder Should Know

        SAFEs Before negotiating a term sheet for preferred stock, many early-stage companies, particularly at the seed stage, first raise capital through...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Business Restructuring and Insolvency Attorney Nimra Tariq

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to announce that Nimra Tariq has joined the firm’s Business Restructuring and Insolvency Group as an...