You Might Be a Winner
        A blog from the attorneys of Verrill

        There’s No Such Thing as a “Free” Sample: FTC Provides Guidance on Advertising “Free” Samples Combined with Recurring Charges

        by Robert Laplaca on September 23, 2016

        On Tuesday (September 20, 2016), the FTC and Nutraclick entered into a consent order concerning Nutraclick’s online offer for “free” samples of supplements and beauty products. The FTC alleged that Nutraclick failed to clearly disclose to people who requested the samples that they would be enrolled in a membership program and billed up to $79.99 per month, unless they canceled within an 18-day trial period. While this promotional offer may have netted significant profits, its success was short-lived when at least 70,000 filed complaints prompting the FTC investigation.

        The FTC alleged violations of the FTC Act’s prohibition against unfair or deceptive acts or practices (15 U.S.C. §45(a)) and the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act, which pertains to selling online through a negative option feature, i.e., where a consumer’s silence is interpreted as an acceptance of the offer. 15 U.S.C. §8403.

        The Promotion (According to the FTC Complaint):

        1. Nutraclick’s ads and emails encouraged consumers to “CLICK HERE TO GET YOUR FREE SAMPLE”
        2. When you “click here” you go to a landing page with a brightly-colored button stating “FREE SAMPLE”.
        3. When you click this button, you go to a page to type in your personal information.
        4. You are then directed to a page to provide your shipping information and “answer a few questions.” This page states “FREE SAMPLE, PAY ONLY SHIPPING AND HANDLING.”
        5. You are then directed to a page to enter your credit card information, stating “Just pay for shipping and handling.”

        Disclosures:

        1. The website had a small gray bar at the bottom of some pages that contained hyperlinks to “Terms”, “Privacy Policy”, “Copyright Information”, etc. Only the “Terms” hyperlink triggered a pop-up box describing the membership program and recurring monthly fees. The online sign-up did not require consumers to click on this link to get the “free” sample.
        2. The payment page had in the lower left corner a long paragraph in small type that describes the “Terms & Conditions.” Half-way through, the recurring charges and cancellation process is described.
        3. Later, Nutraclick added two disclosures to its payment page: (i) a description of the cancelation method mixed with information regarding shipping and product satisfaction and next to a large seal stating “Money-Back Guarantee” and (ii) a check box below the payment information agreeing to the terms and conditions (without a hyperlink).

        Resolution:

        According to the Consent Order, Nutraclick must disclose “clearly and conspicuously” and in “close proximity” to the billing information, the following:

        1. That a consumer will be charged and incur recurring charges.
        2. The amount and frequency of such charges.
        3. The deadline for a consumer to act to stop incurring charges.
        4. The seller of the products.
        5. A description of the products.
        6. The mechanism for stopping any recurring charges.

        In addition, Nutraclick must send by email or mail written confirmation of the transaction to the consumer within 10 days of the sale which must (i) clearly and conspicuously identify the purpose of the mailing and (ii) contain the above disclosures.

        Specifically, with regard to the negative option feature (i.e., where a consumer is required to take affirmative steps to stop recurring billing), Nutraclick must:

        1. Obtain a consumer’s express consent through a check box, signature or other similar method.
        2. Clearly and conspicuously disclose in close proximity to such check box/signature line:
          1. That the consumer will be charged unless the consumer takes steps to stop;
          2. The amount of such charges;
          3. The deadline for the consumer to act to stop recurring charges.

        Further, the method to stop recurring charges must be a “simple mechanism” which is not “difficult, costly, confusing or time consuming” and “at least as simple as the mechanism the consumer used to initiate the recurring charge.”

        For reference, the term “clearly and conspicuously,” generally, means “difficult to miss (i.e, easily noticeable) and easily understandable by ordinary consumers.” And the term “close proximity” means “immediately adjacent to the triggering representation.”

        The bottom line, as always, make sure when you disclose something as “free” that any qualifiers are clearly disclosed. And if you have a negative option feature be particularly vigilant that the consumers are well-aware of what they are getting into and how they can get out of it. Don’t forget you are dealing with an FTC “Consumer Protection Act” and “Restore Online Shopper’s Confidence Act” – the names alone tell you who gets the benefit of the doubt.

        You Might Be a Winner

        Promotion and sweepstakes laws vary widely across the fifty states and under federal regulations, creating complex challenges for today’s innovative marketers. This blog explores the latest updates and trends in promotion and marketing law, offering practical insights to help brands stay compliant while pushing creative boundaries. We’ll also discuss noteworthy, questionable, and groundbreaking promotional campaigns to encourage thoughtful discussion among marketing and legal professionals.

        Key Contacts

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...
        Blog

        Will the Knicks Beat the Spurs? (Are Prediction Market Event Contracts Gambling?)

        For those of you who like to keep score, currently 18 states are engaged in litigation over prediction markets, such as Kalshi and Polymarket,...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Faster Review and Enhanced Enforcement for Benefits-Fraud FCA Matters

        On May 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Division issued a new memorandum, “Accelerating Review and Enhancing Enforcement in...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown; Signals Intensified Medicaid Enforcement Nationwide

        On May 21, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a first-of-its kind Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown charging 15 defendants, including...
        Media Mentions

        Lauren Galvin Quoted in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly on Arbitration and Anti-SLAPP Protections

        Verrill Partner Lauren Galvin was recently featured in a Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly article highlighting a notable Superior Court decision...
        Blog

        Section 530A Accounts: What Employers Should Consider Before Offering Contributions to “Trump” Accounts

        Section 530A accounts, commonly referred to as Trump accounts, have attracted attention since the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in...
        Blog

        Navigating PBM Reform: Regulatory Changes, Market Shifts, and Practical Guidance for ERISA Fiduciaries

        Pharmacy Benefit Manager (“PBM”) arrangements have long relied on rebates with limited transparency into true drug costs. Recent regulatory and...
        Blog

        DOL’s Proposed Regulation on Selecting Alternative Investments: Broad Implications for 401(k) and 403(b) Plan Fiduciaries

        On March 30, 2026, the Department of Labor issued a proposed regulation purporting to implement an executive order to expand access to “alternative...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Attorney Gracie Castle

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to welcome Gracie Castle to the firm’s Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Group as an Associate,...
        Published Works

        Francesco De Vito Authors Article in the Journal of the American College of Mortgage Attorneys

        Verrill Partner Frank De Vito authored an article featured in the Spring 2026 issue of The Abstract, the journal of the American College of Mortgage...