You Might Be a Winner
        A blog from the attorneys of Verrill

        What’s a Prize? Illinois Federal Court Holds In-App Purchases for a Chance to Win Enhanced Game Play Is Not Illegal Gambling

        by Robert Laplaca on February 11, 2016

        Recently, the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois dismissed a putative class action lawsuit claiming that the online game Castle Clash involved illegal gambling because players could make in-app purchases to win “Heroes”, “gems”, “shards” and “Honor Badges” to enhance their gaming experience.

        I think I got this right: In Castle Clash, players amass armies of “Heroes” to do battle against one another. During play, the players collect “shards” – a type of virtual currency – in the game’s “dungeon” and can use these shards to obtain new Heroes from the “Hero Shop”. Also, when a player downloads the game, she is provided with some “gems” to use to make in-app “purchases” within the game to enhance play. Players can amass more gems by buying them, with prices ranging from $1.99 to $99.99. A player can collect Heroes without using her shards by purchasing gems to enter a “Talent Roll” where Heroes are awarded randomly (with a lesser chance of winning better Heroes). There are also in-app events where players with a lot of gems are awarded rare Heroes. The Heroes cannot be redeemed for cash.

        To put it simply, you can pay for a better chance to win thingies that make your game play that much more thrilling.

        The plaintiffs alleged that this structure constituted an illegal lottery/gambling under Illinois, Michigan and California law. As we know, an illegal lottery equals prize, chance and consideration. Chance is clearly involved. The federal court judge also believed that the payments were consideration. But he dismissed the complaint holding that there are no actual “prizes” because the items won had no actual monetary value. The judge stated, with tongue firmly in cheek, “Castle Clash players may be ecstatic when they win rare Heroes, honor badges, gems or shards, but these items have no measurable value. They are therefore not prizes under the statute.”

        The bottom line is that a prize with no monetary value is not a prize.

        You Might Be a Winner

        Promotion and sweepstakes laws vary widely across the fifty states and under federal regulations, creating complex challenges for today’s innovative marketers. This blog explores the latest updates and trends in promotion and marketing law, offering practical insights to help brands stay compliant while pushing creative boundaries. We’ll also discuss noteworthy, questionable, and groundbreaking promotional campaigns to encourage thoughtful discussion among marketing and legal professionals.

        Key Contacts

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Published Works

        Jay McCormack and Michael Fee Co-Author AHLA Article on Skin Substitute Enforcement Trends

        Verrill Partners Jay McCormack and Michael Fee co-authored an article for the American Health Law Association's Fraud and Abuse Practice Group...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Health Care & Life Sciences Attorney Elpida Velmahos

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to announce that Elpida Velmahos has joined the firm’s Health Care & Life Sciences Group as an...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Litigation & Trial Attorney Emma Pooler

        PORTLAND, Maine – Verrill is pleased to announce that Emma Pooler has joined the firm’s Litigation & Trial Group as an Associate, resident in...
        Published Works

        Four Verrill Attorneys Co-Author Massachusetts Trends and Developments Chapter for Chambers and Partners Child Relocation 2026 Guide

        Verrill attorneys Mary H. Schmidt, Rachel A. Deering, Hannah R. Zukoff, and Mariah G. Tappan co-authored the “Trends and Developments” chapter...
        Blog

        A New Protected Class in Maine: Holders of Final Protection Orders

        In the lead-up to Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October, employers may be taking a closer look at how their policies and practices respond to...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...
        Blog

        Hurry Up and Wait

        This is the third in a series of Verrill blog posts on Maine’s packaging extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) law[1]. In July we reported...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses First Brands Chapter 11 Case in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the rejection of First Brands Group's Chapter 11 plan and the...
        Media Mentions

        Cybersecurity and AI Governance: Scott Anderson Featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        Verrill Managing Partner Scott Anderson was recently featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly discussing how law firms can build attorney buy-in for...
        Blog

        Section 530A Account Update: ERISA Status of Trump Accounts

        The Department of Labor has issued important guidance addressing whether employer programs that permit contributions to Section 530A accounts (and...
        Press Releases

        97 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2027, Including Four Named Lawyers of the Year

        AUGUSTA, Maine, BANGOR, Maine, BOSTON, Mass., PORTLAND, Maine, and WESTPORT, Conn., (August 20, 2026) – Verrill is proud to announce that 97...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SEC’s Proposed “Reg Crypto”: What Founders Need to Know

        Startup founders and emerging-growth companies have a number of options for raising capital under the federal securities laws, including Regulation D...