You Might Be a Winner
        A blog from the attorneys of Verrill

        Why is That in the Official Rules? What to Know When You Copy and Paste

        by Robert Laplaca on July 12, 2016

        According to Wikipedia, the term “copy-and-paste” refers to the popular, simple method of reproducing text from a source to a destination. We all do it. You may even do it to draft your Official Rules for a sweepstakes or contest. No need to re-create the wheel, right? But, to continue this metaphor, if you are creating a wheel and want it to hold up your new car, you don’t want to just take someone else’s word that the wheel works without knowing how or why it works.

        Here are some commonly copied Official Rules provisions, along with an explanation of why they’re in there:

        • “NO PURCHASE NECESSARY.” Required by many states, including that it must be clearly and conspicuously disclosed. Hence, it is typically at the beginning of the Rules and in capital letters.
        • “PURCHASE WILL NOT INCREASE YOUR CHANCE OF WINNING.” This phrase is required under Federal Deceptive Mailing and Enforcement Act for direct mail promotions.
        • “Open only to legal residents of the 50 United States and D.C.” Saying just “residents of the United States” could conceivably be interpreted as including residents of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and Guam. Nothing wrong with opening the sweeps to these residents, but at least do it intentionally.
        • “You must be physically present in the 50 United States or D.C. when entering.” This is often used in combination with the requirement that the entrant be a US resident to try to ensure that U.S. law will apply to any disputes.
        • “Entrants must be 13 or older.” This is used for online promotions to avoid having to comply with the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act which applies to online promotions directed to children under 13.
        • “Entrants must be 18 or older.” – Many court decisions have held that the Official Rules form a binding contract between the sponsor and the entrant. The age of consent to enter into a binding contract is 18 in most states, except Mississippi – 21 and Alabama and Nebraska – 19.
        • “Employees of Sponsor and anyone associated with this promotion, as well as their family and householder members are not eligible.” This is included to try to ensure that there is no appearance of, or actual, impropriety in the administration of the promotion and selection of winners.
        • “Approximate retail value (ARV) of prize is …” This is required under the laws of many states.
        • “By participating, you grant Sponsor permission to use your name, photograph, voice, any other likeness, or comments for publicity purposes, in any and all media, now known or hereafter devised, without further compensation, unless prohibited by law.” The phrase “unless prohibited by law” is added because you cannot require a person from Tennessee to provide a publicity release.
        • “Winner will be required to sign a prize release.” While the Official Rules form a binding contract, the laws of some states such as MA, NY, RI, VT, VA and WI require releases to be in writing and signed by the releasor.
        • “An IRS Form 1099 will be issued to winner.” Under IRS regulations, the sponsor must send an IRS Form 1099 to winners of prizes of $600 or more.
        • “If due to a printing, production or other error, more prizes are claimed than are intended to be awarded for any prize level, the intended prizes will be awarded in a random drawing from among all verified and validated prize claims received for that prize level. In no event will more than the stated number of prizes be awarded.” The Kraft clause. In 1989 lawsuits were brought against Kraft in its “Ready to Roll” promotion where due to printing errors at least 10,000 entrants had valid claims to the one grand prize and as a result Kraft end up paying millions of dollars to settle these claims. Subsequently, companies inserted this “Kraft clause” in the rules for seeded games and it has been upheld a number of times, most notably in lawsuits involving the NY Daily News where seeding mistakes occurred. See, Sargent v. NY Daily News, 42 A.D.3d 491 (NY 2d Dep’t 2007).
        • “To obtain a list of the winners, send a SASE to …” The availability of a winners’ list is required under the laws of FL, MD, MA, NY, RI, TN (and MI and WI for in pack games).

        There are, of course, many other provisions that should be included in the Official Rules, but at least now after you’re finished copying and pasting, and you are asked, “why is that in the Rules”, you will have a spiffy answer.

        You Might Be a Winner

        Promotion and sweepstakes laws vary widely across the fifty states and under federal regulations, creating complex challenges for today’s innovative marketers. This blog explores the latest updates and trends in promotion and marketing law, offering practical insights to help brands stay compliant while pushing creative boundaries. We’ll also discuss noteworthy, questionable, and groundbreaking promotional campaigns to encourage thoughtful discussion among marketing and legal professionals.

        Key Contacts

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...
        Blog

        Will the Knicks Beat the Spurs? (Are Prediction Market Event Contracts Gambling?)

        For those of you who like to keep score, currently 18 states are engaged in litigation over prediction markets, such as Kalshi and Polymarket,...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Faster Review and Enhanced Enforcement for Benefits-Fraud FCA Matters

        On May 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Division issued a new memorandum, “Accelerating Review and Enhancing Enforcement in...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown; Signals Intensified Medicaid Enforcement Nationwide

        On May 21, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a first-of-its kind Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown charging 15 defendants, including...
        Media Mentions

        Lauren Galvin Quoted in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly on Arbitration and Anti-SLAPP Protections

        Verrill Partner Lauren Galvin was recently featured in a Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly article highlighting a notable Superior Court decision...
        Blog

        Section 530A Accounts: What Employers Should Consider Before Offering Contributions to “Trump” Accounts

        Section 530A accounts, commonly referred to as Trump accounts, have attracted attention since the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in...
        Blog

        Navigating PBM Reform: Regulatory Changes, Market Shifts, and Practical Guidance for ERISA Fiduciaries

        Pharmacy Benefit Manager (“PBM”) arrangements have long relied on rebates with limited transparency into true drug costs. Recent regulatory and...
        Blog

        DOL’s Proposed Regulation on Selecting Alternative Investments: Broad Implications for 401(k) and 403(b) Plan Fiduciaries

        On March 30, 2026, the Department of Labor issued a proposed regulation purporting to implement an executive order to expand access to “alternative...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Attorney Gracie Castle

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to welcome Gracie Castle to the firm’s Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Group as an Associate,...
        Published Works

        Francesco De Vito Authors Article in the Journal of the American College of Mortgage Attorneys

        Verrill Partner Frank De Vito authored an article featured in the Spring 2026 issue of The Abstract, the journal of the American College of Mortgage...