July 31, 2025 - Alerts and Newsletters

        Legal Readiness for AI in Healthcare: A Provider’s Quick Guide

        Artificial Intelligence (AI) continues to revolutionize industries and is poised to bring transformative change in healthcare delivery, drug discovery, diagnostics, and data analysis and communication. This technology is exciting and offers tremendous possibilities for both patients and providers. With new technologies, however, there are new risks and rewards to consider. Healthcare providers must carefully consider the legal implications of incorporating AI tools into their operations and clinical practices. A few key areas stand out at present:

        • Patient data privacy and security remain paramount. Healthcare providers are subject to stringent federal and state regulations, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). Any AI system with access to Protected Health Information (PHI) must meet rigorous standards for data protection. As part of compliance with the Security Rule and the Privacy Rule, AI tools that process PHI should be designed and/or implemented in a manner that follows HIPAA use and disclosure rules, and employs robust encryption, access controls, and compliance checks to avoid potential breaches and costly penalties.
        • The adoption of AI raises important questions about malpractice liability and accountability. The accuracy and reliability of AI-powered diagnostic tools, treatment recommendations, or patient monitoring systems are critical to patient outcomes. Institutional-level providers, group practices, and individual practitioners must carefully assess the risk of error and ensure that appropriate safeguards are in place, such as human oversight and ongoing validation, to minimize the likelihood of errors. Additionally, healthcare providers may need to revise their malpractice insurance policies to address potential legal liability if AI tools contribute to adverse patient outcomes. Providers and insurers will need to reach a consensus as to which responsibilities lie with the AI software developers, the healthcare providers, or both.
        • Healthcare providers must also be mindful of regulatory approvals and ethical considerations when integrating AI into clinical practice. AI-based medical devices or software may require approval from regulatory bodies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before being used in patient care. Additionally, healthcare providers must ensure that AI algorithms are unbiased and transparent in their decision-making processes. This may require ensuring that regular audits are conducted, using true random samples of patient populations in training data, and implementing safeguards to prevent algorithmic discrimination or other outcomes that violate established and accepted provider standards regarding the rights, informed consent, and well-being of patients. Navigating these complex legal and ethical considerations is essential for healthcare stakeholders and businesses of all kinds to successfully and safely adopt AI technologies.

        For more information and legal insights as to how AI may affect your business, please contact Andrew A. Ferrer in Verrill’s Boston office or another member of our Artificial Intelligence & Emerging Technologies group.

        Firm Highlights

        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Health Care & Life Sciences Attorney Elpida Velmahos

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to announce that Elpida Velmahos has joined the firm’s Health Care & Life Sciences Group as an...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Litigation & Trial Attorney Emma Pooler

        PORTLAND, Maine – Verrill is pleased to announce that Emma Pooler has joined the firm’s Litigation & Trial Group as an Associate, resident in...
        Published Works

        Four Verrill Attorneys Co-Author Massachusetts Trends and Developments Chapter for Chambers and Partners Child Relocation 2026 Guide

        Verrill attorneys Mary H. Schmidt, Rachel A. Deering, Hannah R. Zukoff, and Mariah G. Tappan co-authored the “Trends and Developments” chapter...
        Blog

        A New Protected Class in Maine: Holders of Final Protection Orders

        In the lead-up to Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October, employers may be taking a closer look at how their policies and practices respond to...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...
        Blog

        Hurry Up and Wait

        This is the third in a series of Verrill blog posts on Maine’s packaging extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) law[1]. In July we reported...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses First Brands Chapter 11 Case in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the rejection of First Brands Group's Chapter 11 plan and the...
        Media Mentions

        Cybersecurity and AI Governance: Scott Anderson Featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        Verrill Managing Partner Scott Anderson was recently featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly discussing how law firms can build attorney buy-in for...
        Blog

        Section 530A Account Update: ERISA Status of Trump Accounts

        The Department of Labor has issued important guidance addressing whether employer programs that permit contributions to Section 530A accounts (and...
        Press Releases

        97 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2027, Including Four Named Lawyers of the Year

        AUGUSTA, Maine, BANGOR, Maine, BOSTON, Mass., PORTLAND, Maine, and WESTPORT, Conn., (August 20, 2026) – Verrill is proud to announce that 97...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SEC’s Proposed “Reg Crypto”: What Founders Need to Know

        Startup founders and emerging-growth companies have a number of options for raising capital under the federal securities laws, including Regulation D...
        Blog

        After 45 Years, the IRS Speaks on DCAP Nondiscrimination Testing – And It’s Good News

        Employers that provide a Dependent Care Assistance Program will be pleased to learn that for the first time in 45 years, the IRS has issued guidance...