Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        A Brief Guide to Qualified Disclaimers for Retirement Plan Administrators

        by William D. Jewett on September 16, 2024

        A “qualified disclaimer” is a tax-effective way to refuse a transfer of property that would otherwise occur on someone’s death. From time to time, retirement plan administrators may be contacted by a beneficiary who wants a deceased participant’s benefit to go to a contingent beneficiary or the participant’s estate. The way to make that happen is a qualified disclaimer.

        Suppose a plan administrator is contacted by a participant’s family shortly after the participant’s death. The participant had completed the plan’s beneficiary designation form naming one of her children as primary beneficiary and her other child as contingent beneficiary. The children are certain their parent intended for each to be a 50% primary beneficiary. The beneficiary designation cannot be modified to capture that intent, because beneficiary designations become irrevocable at the participant’s death. If the children want to carry out what they believe to be their parent’s wishes, does one child have to receive the entire interest and pay taxes on it before giving half of it to the other? Yes – unless the primary beneficiary makes a qualified disclaimer with respect to 50% of the interest, leaving that portion of the benefit to pass directly to the contingent beneficiary.

        The requirements for making a qualified disclaimer are set out in Internal Revenue Code section 2518. While this section is found in the part of the tax code that contains the gift tax rules, a qualified disclaimer is generally effective for shifting the burden of income taxes since a qualified disclaimer must result in the property passing directly to another person under applicable state law. To make a qualified disclaimer, four requirements must be met:

        1. The refusal to accept the interest must be in writing.
        2. The refusal must result in the interest passing to someone else under applicable law.
        3. The person refusing the transfer must not have accepted it, including, for example, by cashing a check or by directing the interest to a specific recipient.
        4. The written refusal must be received by the transferor of the interest not later than nine months after the date of the transfer or the date the person refusing reaches age 21.

        In the case of a retirement plan beneficiary, the last requirement means the beneficiary would generally have to submit a written refusal to the plan administrator not later than 9 months after the participant’s death, which is when the transfer is deemed to have occurred.

        It may seem unusual for a beneficiary to refuse a deceased participant’s benefit, but consider the following scenarios. Suppose a primary beneficiary whose children are named as contingent beneficiaries considers that the assets would eventually reach the children in any case and decides it is preferable for the assets to be taxed now at the lower rate applicable to the children. Or suppose a primary beneficiary with another family member or a trust named as contingent beneficiary is the potential target of a legal claim and is seeking to empty his deep pockets while keeping assets close by. Or suppose a participant and the participant’s spouse decide to name the spouse as primary beneficiary with a trust as contingent beneficiary, to give the spouse a choice at the participant’s death whether to accept the assets or to have them go into the trust, whichever is most advantageous at the time. In each scenario, a qualified disclaimer might be used, and a retirement plan administrator receiving a purported disclaimer would need to know what to do with it.

        A retirement plan administrator who receives a purported disclaimer or an inquiry from a beneficiary regarding a potential disclaimer should take two steps right away. The first step is to note the date the disclaimer is received, to ensure that any deadlines based on the date of death are not missed due to inaction on the plan administrator’s part. The second step is to contact legal counsel to determine whether the disclaimer is effective under applicable law and whether the plan would need to be amended to allow the administrator to honor a qualified disclaimer. If a disclaimer is found not to be effective, the disclaimant should be informed promptly and advised to seek separate legal counsel. If it is found to be effective, and if the plan’s provisions permit qualified disclaimers, the plan administrator can direct the plan’s recordkeeper to proceed as if the disclaimant never had a right to the disclaimed interest.

        If you have questions about the effect of qualified disclaimers in the context of retirement plans, please contact a member of our Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Key Contact

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Blog

        Will the Knicks Beat the Spurs? (Are Prediction Market Event Contracts Gambling?)

        For those of you who like to keep score, currently 18 states are engaged in litigation over prediction markets, such as Kalshi and Polymarket,...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Faster Review and Enhanced Enforcement for Benefits-Fraud FCA Matters

        On May 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Division issued a new memorandum, “Accelerating Review and Enhancing Enforcement in...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown; Signals Intensified Medicaid Enforcement Nationwide

        On May 21, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a first-of-its kind Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown charging 15 defendants, including...
        Media Mentions

        Lauren Galvin Quoted in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly on Arbitration and Anti-SLAPP Protections

        Verrill Partner Lauren Galvin was recently featured in a Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly article highlighting a notable Superior Court decision...
        Blog

        Section 530A Accounts: What Employers Should Consider Before Offering Contributions to “Trump” Accounts

        Section 530A accounts, commonly referred to as Trump accounts, have attracted attention since the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in...
        Blog

        Navigating PBM Reform: Regulatory Changes, Market Shifts, and Practical Guidance for ERISA Fiduciaries

        Pharmacy Benefit Manager (“PBM”) arrangements have long relied on rebates with limited transparency into true drug costs. Recent regulatory and...
        Blog

        DOL’s Proposed Regulation on Selecting Alternative Investments: Broad Implications for 401(k) and 403(b) Plan Fiduciaries

        On March 30, 2026, the Department of Labor issued a proposed regulation purporting to implement an executive order to expand access to “alternative...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Attorney Gracie Castle

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to welcome Gracie Castle to the firm’s Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Group as an Associate,...
        Published Works

        Francesco De Vito Authors Article in the Journal of the American College of Mortgage Attorneys

        Verrill Partner Frank De Vito authored an article featured in the Spring 2026 issue of The Abstract, the journal of the American College of Mortgage...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Recent FinCEN Advisory Highlights Rising Health Care Fraud Risk for Financial Institutions

        As the federal government intensifies its “whole of government” approach to combat fraud, waste, and abuse, particularly in Federal Health Care...
        Press Releases

        Two Verrill Attorneys Featured in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Bankruptcy & Restructuring Lawyers List

        PORTLAND, Maine – Verrill attorneys Roger A. Clement, Jr. and Robert J. Keach have been featured in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global...
        Published Works

        Verrill Attorney Mark Googins Co-Authors Maine Commercial Lending Handbook

        Verrill attorney Mark Googins has co-authored the Maine Commercial Lending Handbook (Second Edition), published March 2026.  A trusted, practical...