FDA Issues Guidance on IRB Review of Non-Emergency Individual Patient Expanded Access Requests for Investigational Drugs and Biological Products to Treat COVID-19

June 18, 2020 Alerts and Newsletters

Prompted by a substantial increase in requests for individual patient access to investigational drugs and biologics to treat COVID-19, the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (“FDA”) issued guidance on June 2, 2020 that outlines key factors and procedures that Institutional Review Boards (“IRBs”) should consider when reviewing such non-emergency requests.

In the guidance, the FDA recommends that IRBs:

  • Consider establishing procedures for a single IRB member to review an expanded access submission for an individual patient. Except for emergency expanded access use[1], a physician who wishes to treat a patient with an investigational drug under expanded access is responsible for obtaining IRB review and approval consistent with 21 C.F.R. Part 56 before beginning treatment.[2] However, the FDA permits physicians to obtain concurrence by the IRB chairperson or by a designated IRB member in lieu of a review and approval at a convened IRB meeting at which a majority of the members are present. Physicians may indicate to the FDA their intent to obtain concurrence when submitting the streamlined FDA Form 3926 for individual patient expanded access requests, which includes a checkbox for the physician to opt for the alternative IRB review procedure. In the guidance, the FDA explains that the IRB’s procedures for review by a single member should (i) reflect the information that the IRB deems relevant for a single IRB member review, and (ii) ensure that the IRB member documents the decision to concur or not concur with the treatment.
  • Focus the review of an expanded access request for an individual patient on assessing the risks and benefits for the specific patient involved, based on their unique clinical characteristics. In other words, IRBs should determine whether the risks associated with the proposed treatment have been minimized for the particular patient and whether such risks are reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits for that patient. In the guidance, the FDA clarifies that it does not expect that a formal protocol will be necessary for the IRB to make these determinations. Instead, a thorough patient history and treatment plan can suffice, provided they include the following information: (i) the proposed daily dose, route, and frequency of administration, duration of planned treatment, criteria for discontinuation of treatment, and planned dose modifications for adverse events; (ii) the planned monitoring for adverse events, response to treatment, and changes in clinical status, as well as proposed modifications to the treatment plan to mitigate risks to the patient, if appropriate; (iii) key details of the patient’s history, including diagnosis and summary of prior therapy, information regarding a patient’s relevant clinical characteristics (e.g., comorbid conditions; concomitant medications) necessary to assess the potential for increased risks of the drug; and (iv) a summary of known risks of the drug. The FDA notes that additional information may be necessary to facilitate IRB review of expanded access requests for intermediate-size and larger-size patient populations.

The FDA also highlighted other important components of the IRB’s review:

  • Assessing the qualifications of the physician submitting the request.
  • If the request is for a pediatric patient, confirming that age-appropriate assent is solicited from the patient and permission from a parent or guardian is obtained, as required under 21 C.F.R. § 50.55.
  • Confirming that the informed consent form for the treatment includes a statement that explains the investigational nature of the drug and the fact that the FDA has not determined that the drug is safe or effective for use in treating COVID-19. This type of statement will satisfy the requirements of 21 C.F.R. § 50.25(a)(1).

This guidance represents an important effort by the FDA to respond to continuing uncertainty by IRBs as to how to review expanded access requests for treatment of individual patients through the lens of the research approval and informed consent criteria that they are required to apply even though expanded access uses are not research. Although the FDA’s recommendations are intended to remain in effect only for the duration of the COVID-19 public health emergency declared by the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services, the FDA indicated that this guidance is expected to assist the FDA more broadly in its continued effort to facilitate patient access to drugs through expanded access beyond the public health emergency, and noted that it reflects the FDA’s general thinking on this issue. As such, within 60 days following the termination of the COVID-19 public health emergency, the FDA intends to revise and replace this guidance based on any comments received and the FDA’s experience with its implementation.

Given the COVID-19 public health emergency, this guidance is being implemented without prior public comment, but it remains subject to comment in accordance with the FDA’s good guidance practices. You may submit a comment on the guidance online by clicking here. You may also mail your written comments to: Dockets Management, Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All written comments should be identified with the docket number: FDA-2020-D-1414.

For questions regarding the guidance or the IRB’s role in reviewing expanded access requests, please contact Marylana Saadeh Helou, Emily Fogler, or your regular Verrill attorney.

To learn more about expanded access and related issues, and to access a COVID-19 Expanded Access template that health care providers and drug manufacturers can use to memorialize the circumstances of the provision of an investigational drug for expanded access use, please see our prior alerts and publications here.


[1] In an emergency situation when there is not sufficient time to secure IRB review prior to beginning treatment, the investigational drug can be used (assuming other criteria for expanded access are met), but the emergency use must be reported to the IRB within 5 working days of the use, as required under 21 C.F.R. § 56.104(c).

[2] See 21 C.F.R. 312.305(c)(4).

Firm Highlights

Publication/Podcast

More Proposed Changes to CCPA Geared to Health Care and Life Sciences Industries

The California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (“CCPA”) took effect on January 1, 2020. Days later on January 8, 2020, the California Senate Health Committee unanimously approved Senate bill A.B. 713 (the “Bill”) to...

Matter

FDA Advertising/Promotion

Presented to senior executives and other management of a start-up pharmaceutical company on complying with U.S. Department of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advertising and promotion requirements pre- and post-launch.

Publication/Podcast

Massachusetts Budget Update: Commonwealth Now Waiting on Governor Baker

On July 22, 2019, the Massachusetts House of Representatives ("House") and Senate Conference Committee ("Conference Committee") released the Commonwealth's $43.1 billion fiscal year 2020 budget bill (" H. 4000 "). It passed the House...

Publication/Podcast

FDA Announces New Updates to its Guidance on Conducting Clinical Trials During COVID-19 and Notes Availability of its COVID MyStudies App

On June 3, 2020, the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (“FDA”) again updated its guidance on the “ Conduct of Clinical Trials of Medical Products during COVID-19 Public Health Emergency ” with new information...

Publication/Podcast

Proposed Regulations Under the CCPA Provide Some Clarity, But Questions Remain

Earlier this month, the California Attorney General issued long-awaited proposed regulations (“Proposed Rule”) under the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) [1] along with a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Action and Initial Statement of Reasons...

Matter

Informed Consent Form Templates

Developed 23 different types of global research informed consent templates for a major pharmaceutical company along with detailed negotiation guidelines for compliance with applicable laws and best practices.

Matter

On-Site Counsel

Served as on-site, long-term legal counsel for various pharmaceutical and device companies during times of staffing shortage at the companies.

Publication/Podcast

COVID-19 Expanded Access Template

We are aware that many companies and health care providers are working to expedite the transfer of investigational drugs that may be helpful in treating patients suffering from COVID-19. Although these expanded access arrangements...

Matter

CAN-SPAM/E-Sign Act

Acted as the go-to advisor for a pharmaceutical company for advice on CAN-SPAM and E-Sign Act.

Matter

European Union GDPR—Pharmaceutical Company

Advised pharmaceutical company on all aspects of compliance with the European Union General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), including gap analysis, policy and procedure development, and vendor and other third party contract revisions.