60% Is Not a Cliff, Indeed

June 15, 2020 Alerts and Newsletters

On June 11, the Small Business Administration (SBA) and the Treasury Department published important guidance that the revised 60% condition under the Paycheck Protection Program Flexibility Act will be applied proportionately, and not as a cliff.

Background. The CARES Act, enacted on March 27, authorized loans to a wide range of small businesses in an amount equal to 2.5 months of prior year payroll costs (as defined). These loans were eligible under Section 1106 to be forgiven, but only to the extent that the entire loan proceeds were spent on covered costs during an 8-week covered period. Moreover, forgiveness was made subject to potential offsets for reduced headcounts or for wages reduced by more than 25%.

On top of these complicated statutory offsets to forgiveness, SBA/Treasury additionally imposed (by rule) another important limitation – namely that payroll costs expended during the 8-week period must constitute at least 75% of the total amount for which forgiveness is sought. Failure to reach 75% resulted in proportional reduction in forgiveness. For example, if a business spent 70% of the loan amount on payroll costs, its maximum forgiveness would be 70/75ths of the loan amount.

For most businesses, spending 75% of their loan amount on payroll costs within an 8-week period was difficult, if not impossible, and so the 75% condition was the subject of much criticism.

Concern about the New 60% Threshold. Congress stepped in with the Flexibility Act. As summarized in our earlier article, The New PPP Math: 24 + 60 = > Forgiveness + > Paperwork, the Act not only extended (to 24 weeks, instead of 8) the period during which covered costs may be expended, but also loosened the 75% standard:

“To receive loan forgiveness under [CARES Act § 1106], an eligible recipient shall use at least 60 percent of the covered loan amount for payroll costs, and may use up to 40 percent of such amount for any payment of [covered nonpayroll costs].”

Many commentators had read this new 60% condition as a “cliff” – i.e. zero forgiveness unless payroll costs during the covered period reach at least 60% – rather than a mere substitution of 60% for 75% under the proportionate disqualification approach adopted by SBA/Treasury.

Swift Clarification. With its June 11 guidance, SBA/Treasury has moved quickly to quell these concerns:

“While the Flexibility Act provides that a borrower shall use at least 60 percent of the PPP loan for payroll costs to receive loan forgiveness, the [SBA] Administrator, in consultation with the [Treasury] Secretary, interprets this requirement as a proportional limit on nonpayroll costs as a share of the borrower’s loan forgiveness amount, rather than as a threshold for receiving any loan forgiveness. This interpretation is consistent with the new safe harbor in the Flexibility Act.”

Firm Highlights

Publication/Podcast

PPP Forgiveness Planning Scenarios

How to use this article: You already know that the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) is highly complex, with intertwining conditions, exceptions, and definitions that defy simple explanation. This article assumes that you are pretty...

News

Paycheck Protection Program Focuses on Short-Term and Misses Long-Term Damages

On June 8, the Portland Press Herald published an article, "Revamped emergency loan program remains a short-term fix," discussing the Paycheck Protection Program's (PPP) extended deadlines and loosened restrictions, but lack of solutions to...

Matter

Banking: Helping Non-Depository Trust Companies Do Business in Other States

Verrill has helped to form more non-depository trust companies in Maine than any other law firm. We have also helped our trust clients when they look to expand their business into other states. In...

Publication/Podcast

FINALLY!!! . . . SBA Guidance on the Forgiveness Math

The Punch Line : On Friday, May 15, the Small Business Administration published a new form entitled Loan Forgiveness Application Instructions for Borrowers which, at long last, provides a great deal of guidance on...

News

35 Verrill Attorneys Named 2020 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars

(November 9, 2020) – The 2020 edition of New England Super Lawyers and Rising Stars© has recognized a total of 35 Verrill attorneys for excellence in their individual areas of practice. Only the top...

Publication/Podcast

PPP Math for the Self-Employed: And, Yes, There is Still Time

The Small Business Administration reports that as of May 23 it still had nearly $150 billion of untapped Paycheck Protection Program funds. The Program has been underutilized by self-employed business owners, in part due...

News

Nearly 80 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2021, Including a Dozen Named Lawyers of the Year

(August 24, 2020) – Nearly 80 Verrill attorneys were recognized as "Best Lawyers" by Best Lawyers® 2021 , including 12 attorneys named “Lawyer of the Year,” a distinguished recognition for only a single lawyer...

Matter

Banking: Establishment of Non-Depository Trust for National Company

Verrill served as special counsel to a national firm in the chartering and licensing of a Maine non-depository trust company as the client’s wholly-owned subsidiary. Non-depository trust companies are highly regulated, and the matter...

Publication/Podcast

The New PPP Math: 24 + 60 = > Forgiveness + > Paperwork

On June 5, the President signed into law the Paycheck Protection Program Flexibility Act. This is the second amendment to the Program, the first being on April 24, to increase funding levels to $659...

Matter

Allagash becomes Maine’s First Benefit Corporation

Allagash Benefit Event
Contact Verrill at (855) 307 0700