New Rules for Apprentices on Energy Projects Come with Uncertainty for Contractors and Developers

April 21, 2022 Alerts and Newsletters

On January 1, 2021, a new law went into effect setting benchmarks for use of apprentices on energy generation facility construction projects. Enacted in 2019, the law was part of “An Act to Establish a Green New Deal for Maine” and can be found at 26 M.R.S.A. §§ 3501 and 3502. Under the new law, employers engaged in construction energy generation facilities are required to use a prescribed number of apprentices. Beginning on January 1, 2021, “10% of all persons employed in the construction" of an energy generation facility must be apprentices. That percentage increases to 17.5% on January 1, 2025, and then increases again to 20% on January 1, 2027.

Under the regulations the phrase “persons employed in the construction” means “all persons employed in an apprenticeable occupation during any phase or time period of an operation to construct a generation facility, or during the entire duration of such an operation or during some combination of those periods of time.” This definition narrows the project workforce to which these apprentice percentage requirements apply to those jobs that traditionally offer an apprenticeship path to career development. [1]

The statute also authorized the Maine Department of Labor (MDOL) to develop and issue regulations for the implementation and enforcement of the new law. This rule-making process is important because the statute itself offers little guidance about how contractors should comply with the law or what to do if they are unable find enough apprentices. The MDOL’s regulations for the new law were finally issued on January 15, 2022. These new regulations can be found here. Unfortunately, the regulations provide little guidance for affected contractors and subcontractors meaning that there is likely to be some confusion over how the law will be enforced.

The primary concern with the implementation of this law is the general lack of available apprentices and apprenticeship programs within the State of Maine. Maine contractors are open-shop for the most part. Although a few larger Maine-based non-union contractors have apprentice programs up and running, most Maine-based contractors will be at a serious disadvantage in complying with these new laws in the short term. Industry associations such as Associated General Contractors (AGC) of Maine have played a significant role in development of apprentice programs for its members and the industry as a whole. Upstart apprentice programs present a challenge due to Maine’s relatively small population and the limited number of young people interested in entering the trades.

The regulations do allow contractors and subcontractors an opportunity to claim that “an insufficient number of qualified apprentices were available to meet the required percentage.” In order to prove this, the regulations require that an employer show that it “made reasonable efforts to find and employ” apprentices. “Reasonable efforts” may “include evidence of having contacted or attempted to contact the Maine Apprenticeship Program, sponsors of apprenticeship training programs such as labor organizations and employers with a presence in Maine, or other appropriate sources.” How MDOL interpret “reasonable efforts” remains to be seen.

The regulations also set forth guidelines for employer self-monitoring and reporting. These rules require that:

  • Before starting a project or a “phase” of a project, an employer must submit to Bureau of Labor Standards (Bureau) within MDOL “a plan for locating and employing a sufficient number of qualified apprentices.”
  • Upon completion of each phase of the construction project, “the employer must submit to the Bureau an interim report of the employer’s efforts to employ qualified apprentices including a clear explanation if they failed to hire a sufficient number of qualified apprentices during that phase of the project.”
  • Upon completion of the project, “the employer must submit a final report also including a clear explanation if they failed to hire a sufficient number of qualified apprentices during the entire project.”

The regulations offer no guidance about what qualifies as a “phase” of an energy facility construction project other than providing that an employer’s “established pay period” may be considered a “phase”. As a practical matter, this term does not have a generally accepted meaning in the industry.

The regulations also include record-keeping requirements including that payroll records must be “available to a Bureau representative on each site covered by the statute” or, if not at the site, “within 10 miles of the site while the project is active”, that the records “be current within three days of the latest pay period that was paid by the contractor or sub-contractor”, and that the records “be retained, preserved, and open to inspection by the Bureau for at least three years following completion of the project.”

Requiring storage at the site or within 10 miles of the site suggests a requirement for the maintenance of paper records. These requirements seem out of step with current electronic record-keeping practices. It seems unreasonable to fault a contractor subject to these rules for storing records electronically on a server residing at its home office.

Finally, the statue allows the Bureau to assess fines of between $50 and $200 per violation. According to the regulations, “[e]ach day a sufficient number of apprentices are not employed in accordance with the law and these rules is a separate violation.”

The goal of using more apprentices on energy construction projects is laudable. Unfortunately, it may be difficult for contractors to comply with the law without further guidance and there is the potential for there to be significant confusion and disagreement over its enforcement. At this point in time, we are not aware of any efforts on MDOL’s part to take any enforcement action on these new rules.

If you have any questions about navigating this new law and its accompanying regulations, please reach out to a construction law attorney at Verrill.

[1] Under 26 M.R.S.A. §3201(2) "apprenticeable occupation" is “an occupation that is specified by industry and that:

A. Involves skills that are customarily learned in a practical way through a structured, systematic program of on-the-job supervised learning;

B. Is clearly identified and commonly recognized throughout an industry;

C. Involves manual, mechanical or technical skills and knowledge that, in accordance with the industry standard for the occupation, require the completion of at least 2,000 hours of on-the-job learning to attain; and

D. Requires related instruction.”

Firm Highlights


Subcontractor Prevails on Wrongful Termination and Delay Claims Following 18 Day Arbitration

Our client was terminated as a mechanical subcontractor on a U.S. Navy project at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard in Kittery, Maine for alleged delays. Our client and its surety faced claims for costs of...


Representative Litigation Matters

Represented one of the nation's largest geotechnical subcontractors in claims against a major general contractor arising from construction of pier improvements at an East Coast naval facility Led defense trial team in a four-week...


Verrill Welcomes Michael B. Donahue to the Firm’s Construction Group


Verrill's Jim Cohen To Speak on Past and Future of Maine’s Electric Grid at 2023 Winter Bar Conference

Verrill partner Jim Cohen will be presenting at the Maine State Bar Association’s Winter Bar Conference 2023, on Friday, January 27, in Portland. Cohen’s presentation, The Past and Future of Maine’s Electric Grid...


Verrill Helps Hancock Solar Project Obtain MDEP Permit, Protect Upland Sandpipers

The 14-megawatt Hancock Solar project in the town of Hancock, Maine has obtained its Site Law permit from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection. Verrill assisted the project with environmental permitting, which included the...



We have assisted many owners, and contractors in design and construction contracting including: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Investment Management Company on over a billion dollars in projects in Kendall Square area of Cambridge, Massachusetts...


Amplify Your Process Safety Podcast with Mathew Todaro


Recovery From Surety and Professional Liability Carrier for Defective Turbine and Biomass Energy Facility Components

Our client developed a biomass fired cogeneration power facility to sell power back to the grid and to support its sawmill operations. As part of this project, it entered into a $13+ million contract...


39 Verrill Attorneys Named 2022 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars


77 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2023, Including Six Named Lawyers of the Year

Contact Verrill at (855) 307 0700