David S. Abramson
Scott D. Anderson
Heidi A. Bean
Thomas O. Bean
Sharon Belisle
Phillip S. Bixby
John Bowen
Cyrus  E. Cheslak
Roger A. Clement, Jr.
Philip M.  Coffin III
Arthur  E. Dentremont, Jr.
Michael B. Donahue
Michael J. Donlan
Jonathan M. Dunitz
Daniel J. Dwyer
Maye C. Emlein
Lauren Galvin
Ann Blanchard
John P. Giffune
Keith E. Glidden
Sarah K. Grossnickle
Ellen M. Harrington
Maura E. Hennessy
Sara E. Hirshon
Nathaniel R. Hull
Brian M. Hurley
Regina M. Hurley
William C. Knowles
Stacie A.  Kosinski
Robert Laplaca
David G. Lazarus
Brett R. Leland
Stuart T. Leslie
Marie J. Mueller
Andrew B. Nevas
Brian J. O'Rourke, Jr.
Alexander Read
Jill M. Roberts
Derek Rocha
Kristen G. Rossetti
A. Robert Ruesch
Jeffrey D.  Russell
Stephen B. Segal
Paul W. Shaw
Frank J. Silvestri, Jr.
Eric A. Smith
Susan J. Swenson
D'Arcy B. Thomson
Mathew J. Todaro
Martin C. Topol
John W. Van Lonkhuyzen
Rachel M. Wertheimer
Calvin K. Woo

Firm Highlights


Litigation Update: Jack Daniels V. Bad Spaniels. Is It Parody or Is It Trademark Infringement?

This week the U.S. Supreme Court will hear argument in the case, Jack Daniel’s Properties Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, U.S. Doc. No. 22-148, to decide the question: Can we do that? It’s been...


Patent Litigation: MEMS Microphones

Represented large semiconductor manufacturer in an ITC investigation and parallel district court proceeding in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, defending against two patents owned by a competitor relating to microelectromechanical...


Patent Litigation: Semiconductors

Represented semiconductor manufacturer in patent case against competitor in litigation in U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, in which both sides asserted patents relating to power management and A-D converters; conducted Markman...


Say What You Mean, Mean What You Say…Gorelick v. Star Markets: A Study in Indemnity

Indemnity clauses in contracts are a valuable tool for allocating risk among the contracting parties, most often risk attendant to personal injury and property damage, and their effect can be far-reaching. Despite their significance...


Patent Litigation: NPEs

Represented many companies over the years in patent litigations brought by numerous non-practicing entities, including in U.S. District Courts for the Eastern District of Texas, District of Delaware and Northern District of California; aggressively...


Patent Litigation: Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Represented small biotech company and two academic researchers against large pharmaceutical company in dispute over inventorship of several patents relating to mesenchymal stem cells and their uses, as well as defending against numerous state...


Seven Verrill Attorneys named to Boston Magazine’s Top Lawyers of 2022 List

(December 8, 2022) Verrill attorneys Ruth A. Mattson , Michael L. Fay , David M. Friedman , Regina M. Hurley , Kyle T. MacDonald , Kristin S. Doeberl and Brian M. Hurley were recently...


Patent & Trade Secret Litigation: IT Infrastructure Software

Represented large provider of IT management solutions in lawsuits in U.S. District Courts for the Eastern District of New York and the Northern District of California against competitor alleging infringement of patents relating to...


Elections and Constitutional Law: Successfully Challenged Certification of Initiative Petition

In a victory for consumers and the ride-hailing public, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court recently barred the Secretary of State from placing on the November ballot initiative petitions proposed by companies such as Uber...


Patent Litigation: Telecommunications

Defended large telecommunication company in patent litigation in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas brought by a competitor over eight patents relating to encryption, unified communications, messaging, and audio and video...

Contact Verrill at (855) 307 0700